• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Mémoire de Maîtrise
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/D.55.1981.tde-16062023-184446
Document
Auteur
Nom complet
Rosa Maria dos Santos Barreiro Chaves
Unité de l'USP
Domain de Connaissance
Date de Soutenance
Editeur
São Carlos, 1981
Directeur
Titre en portugais
Propriedades genéricas de superfícies do R4, dotado de uma forma bilinear
Mots-clés en portugais
Não disponível
Resumé en portugais
Não disponível
Titre en anglais
Generic properties of surfaces in R4 with a bilienar form
Mots-clés en anglais
Not available
Resumé en anglais
This study is about immersions of surfaces in a four dimensional space with a non deqenerated bilinear form. In the cases studied, this form induces in the normal and tangent planes, forms of type (+,+) or (+,-). Three situations: Y1 , Y2 and Y3 are studied and they are based on two papers: one of John A. Little [4] and the other of P. F. J. Dhooghe [3]. In chapter one we see the requirements we need to fix the notations and study the theory involving the second fundamental form too. In chapter two we speak about the cross fields and thenotion of singular point of a cross field. We consider topics in geometrical transversality like models singularities and generic immesions. In chapter three, we consider some cross fields that give informations about the singularities and study the case Y3 separetely because there aren't cross fields there. Át the end, we come to global theorems. Our main purpose was a comparative study that ballowed us to elaborate some theorems e to prove others inexistents in the basic papers. We elucidated some ambiguous topics in [3] and because the situation there wasn't so usual, we had to be careful and decided to give the proofs of many results considering the cases Y2 and Y3. A result to be pointed out is that when we consider the bilinear form Y2 in E4 , the corollary 1.22, given in [4], becomes true, in spite of it isn't correct when we consider the bilinear form Y1 in E4 (see example given by Asperti in [I]).
 
AVERTISSEMENT - Regarde ce document est soumise à votre acceptation des conditions d'utilisation suivantes:
Ce document est uniquement à des fins privées pour la recherche et l'enseignement. Reproduction à des fins commerciales est interdite. Cette droits couvrent l'ensemble des données sur ce document ainsi que son contenu. Toute utilisation ou de copie de ce document, en totalité ou en partie, doit inclure le nom de l'auteur.
Date de Publication
2023-06-19
 
AVERTISSEMENT: Apprenez ce que sont des œvres dérivées cliquant ici.
Tous droits de la thèse/dissertation appartiennent aux auteurs
CeTI-SC/STI
Bibliothèque Numérique de Thèses et Mémoires de l'USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. Tous droits réservés.