• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Master's Dissertation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/D.55.1981.tde-16062023-184446
Document
Author
Full name
Rosa Maria dos Santos Barreiro Chaves
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Carlos, 1981
Supervisor
Title in Portuguese
Propriedades genéricas de superfícies do R4, dotado de uma forma bilinear
Keywords in Portuguese
Não disponível
Abstract in Portuguese
Não disponível
Title in English
Generic properties of surfaces in R4 with a bilienar form
Keywords in English
Not available
Abstract in English
This study is about immersions of surfaces in a four dimensional space with a non deqenerated bilinear form. In the cases studied, this form induces in the normal and tangent planes, forms of type (+,+) or (+,-). Three situations: Y1 , Y2 and Y3 are studied and they are based on two papers: one of John A. Little [4] and the other of P. F. J. Dhooghe [3]. In chapter one we see the requirements we need to fix the notations and study the theory involving the second fundamental form too. In chapter two we speak about the cross fields and thenotion of singular point of a cross field. We consider topics in geometrical transversality like models singularities and generic immesions. In chapter three, we consider some cross fields that give informations about the singularities and study the case Y3 separetely because there aren't cross fields there. Át the end, we come to global theorems. Our main purpose was a comparative study that ballowed us to elaborate some theorems e to prove others inexistents in the basic papers. We elucidated some ambiguous topics in [3] and because the situation there wasn't so usual, we had to be careful and decided to give the proofs of many results considering the cases Y2 and Y3. A result to be pointed out is that when we consider the bilinear form Y2 in E4 , the corollary 1.22, given in [4], becomes true, in spite of it isn't correct when we consider the bilinear form Y1 in E4 (see example given by Asperti in [I]).
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2023-06-19
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.