• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Doctoral Thesis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/T.8.2021.tde-18102021-223025
Document
Author
Full name
Rodolfo Iván Quiroz Rojas
E-mail
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2021
Supervisor
Committee
Arroyo, Maria Mónica (President)
Cataia, Marcio Antonio
Gonzalez, Andres Alfonso Nuñez
Martin, Andre Roberto
Title in Portuguese
Regionalizar para governar (1973-1985): território, geopolítica e neoliberalismo no Chile autoritário
Keywords in Portuguese
CONARA
Geopolítica
Neoliberalismo
Regionalização
Território
Abstract in Portuguese
A reforma político-administrativa promovida pelo regime autoritário chileno foi estrategicamente funcional para a instalação do neoliberalismo. Utilizando uma revisão dos documentos oficiais, artigos de imprensa e entrevistas com acadêmicos e funcionários públicos da época, são analisadas as estruturas técnico-políticas da divisão político-administrativa realizada no Chile entre 1974 e 1985. No trabalho se descreve com ênfase como a definição de fronteiras internas também ativou dispositivos governamentais que condicionaram a deliberação popular e a acomodação do neoliberalismo em termos de projeção burocrática territorial. Analisa-se, então, o uso político do território durante o Chile autoritário, aproximando-se de suas lógicas internas, redes políticas e agências burocráticas do Processo de Regionalização e o Sistema de Governo e Administração Regional (SIGORE). Neste sentido, explica as trajetórias combinadas da Comissão Nacional de Reforma Administrativa (CONARA) e do Escritório Nacional de Planejamento (ODEPLAN) e, sobre elas, o papel (geo)político transcendental de Pinochet durante todo o processo territorial. Se trata de entender uma estrutura territorial com níveis mais elevados de integração no funcionamento de seus governos internos, embora sempre mais guardada e vigiada pela lógica neoliberal e geopolítica de subordinação ao poder central. Essa combinação entre autoritarismo e descentralização foi fundamental para a instalação de um novo tipo de gestão territorial, caraterizada pela tendente privatização dos antigos serviços públicos e a naturalização de práticas locais autoritárias, dependentes dos órgãos centrais, embora com uma maior focalização baseada no padrão econômico dominante.
Title in English
Regionalizing in order to govern (1973-1985): territory, geopolitics and neoliberalism in authoritarian Chile
Keywords in English
CONARA
Geopolitics
Neoliberalism
Regionalization
Territory
Abstract in English
The reform to the political and administrative jurisdictions that was carried out by the authoritarian regime in Chile was functional to the implementation of neoliberalism. Through a review of official documents and press articles, and interviews with academics and officials in charge at that time, this research analyses the technical and political structures of the political and administrative division that was carried out in Chile between 1974 and 1985. It describes how the definition of internal borders activated government mechanisms that structurally lacked popular deliberation and gave social and bureaucratic shape to neoliberalism. Therefore, it analyzes the political use of territories during the authoritarian regime, studying its internal logics, political networks and bureaucratic agencies. Specifically, the research documents the combined trajectories of two organizations: the Comisión Nacional de Reforma Administrativa (CONARA) and the Oficina de Planificación Nacional (ODEPLAN), as well as the transcendental (geo)political role of Pinochet during the reform. The new political and administrative jurisdictions were part of a territorial structure that had higher levels of integration than in the previous governments, but that was more shielded and surveilled by the geopolitical logic of subordination to the central government. This combination of authoritarianism and decentralisation was fundamental for the installation of a new type of territorial management, characterised by a tendency to privatise former public services and the naturalisation of authoritarian local practices, dependent on central bodies, although with a greater focus based on the dominant economic pattern.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2021-10-18
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.