• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Doctoral Thesis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/T.5.2023.tde-24042024-170719
Document
Author
Full name
Giuliana Xavier de Medeiros
E-mail
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2023
Supervisor
Committee
Cunha Neto, Edecio (President)
Moro, Ana Maria
Kokron, Cristina Maria
Oliveira, Sergio Costa
Title in Portuguese
Avaliação da resposta imunológica contra SARS-CoV-2 em grupos de risco vacinados com CoronaVac
Keywords in Portuguese
BNT162b2
CoronaVac
COVID-19
Idade
Imunodeficiência comum variável
Vacina
Abstract in Portuguese
Neste trabalho, tivemos como objetivo avaliar a resposta de grupos vulneráveis à COVID-19, como idosos e pacientes com Imunodeficiência Comum Variável (ICV), vacinados com CoronaVac. Além da resposta ao regime inicial de 2doses, também foi avaliada a resposta ao reforço vacinal com a vacina de RNAm BNT162b2. Níveis de IgG anti-RBD e Spike de SARS-CoV-2, IFN- e IL-2 após ensaio de liberação de citocinas induzido por antígeno, foram determinados por ELISA. Título de neutralização foram quantificados por teste de neutralização baseado em efeito citopático (CPE-VNT) para os dois grupos. Na coorte de idosos, foram incluídos indivíduos vacinados com 2 doses de CoronaVac (N=101, dos quais 54% estão acima dos 55 anos), ou 2 CoronaVac + 1 BNT162b2 (N=31), convalescentes foram recrutados como controles positivos (N=72) e amostras pré-pandêmicas foram incluídas como controle negativo (N=36). Não foi observada diferença na produção de IFN- e IL-2 entre vacinados com 2 doses e convalescentes. Vacinados tiveram maior produção de IgG anti-RBD de SARS-CoV-2, entretanto convalescentes apresentaram maiores títulos de anticorpos neutralizantes. Foi observada uma correlação negativa significativa entre produção de citocinas e anticorpos e idade dos participantes. Mulheres e homens mais jovens apresentaram maior produção de IL-2 em relação aos participantes acima de 55 anos. Homens acima de 55 anos tiveram níveis de IgG anti-RBD diminuídos em comparação àqueles abaixo de 55 anos. Mulheres acima de 55 apresentaram menor produção de anticorpos neutralizantes em comparação às mais jovens. A terceira dose (BNT162b2) levou à um aumento significativo na produção de anticorpos específicos e neutralizantes. O aumento foi observado tanto em indivíduos acima quanto abaixo de 55 anos em relação à 2a dose. Na coorte de imunodeficiência, foram incluídos 26 pacientes com ICV vacinados com 2 doses de CoronaVac (N=14) ou ChAdOx1 (N=9) e vacinados com 2 CoronaVac + 1 BNT162b2 (N=14). Indivíduos saudáveis vacinados com CoronaVac (N=60) e após reforço com BNT162b2 foram incluídos como controles (N=16). Pacientes ICV vacinados com 2 doses ChAdOx1 apresentaram maiores dos níveis de anticorpo anti-RBD e -S em relação aos vacinados com CoronaVac. Vacinados com ChAdOx1 foram os únicos a produzirem anticorpos neutralizantes contra as linhagens Wuhan, Delta e Gama. A resposta celular foi baixa independentemente da plataforma vacinal. O regime de 3 doses (2 CoronaVac + 1 BNT162b2) induziu resposta imune menor do que 2 doses de ChAdOx1. A resposta vacinal de pacientes ICV foi menor do que a de indivíduos saudáveis. Nossos resultados indicam que idosos se beneficiaram da dose heteróloga de BNT162b2, porém a duração desta resposta deve ser avaliada em estudos longitudinais para garantir o calendário ótimo de doses adicionais para este grupo. Os pacientes ICV tiveram uma melhor resposta ao regime de duas doses de ChAdOx1 em comparação ao de 3 doses, sugerindo que aqueles inicialmente vacinados com CoronaVac podem não estar adequadamente protegidos contra a infecção por SARS-CoV-2 e suas complicações.
Title in English
Evaluation of immunological response Against SARS-CoV-2 in risk groups vaccinated with CoronaVac
Keywords in English
Age
BNT162b2
Common variable immunodeficiency
CoronaVac
COVID-19
Vaccine
Abstract in English
In this study, our objective was to evaluate the response of vulnerable groups to COVID-19, such as the elderly and patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID), who were vaccinated with CoronaVac. In addition to the response to the initial 2-dose regimen, the response to booster vaccination with the mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 was also assessed. Levels of anti-RBD and Spike IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2, as well as IFN- and IL-2 levels after antigen-induced cytokine release assay, were determined by ELISA. Neutralization titers were quantified using a cytopathic effect-based neutralization test (CPE-VNT) for both groups. In the elderly cohort, individuals vaccinated with 2 doses of CoronaVac (N=101, of which 54% were above 55 years old) or 2 CoronaVac + 1 BNT162b2 (N=31) were included. Convalescent individuals were recruited as positive controls (N=72), and pre-pandemic samples were included as negative controls (N=36). No difference was observed in the production of IFN- and IL-2 between individuals vaccinated with 2 doses and convalescent individuals. Vaccinated individuals had higher production of anti-RBD IgG antibodies against SARS-CoV-2; however, convalescent individuals exhibited higher titers of neutralizing antibodies. A significant negative correlation was observed between cytokine production and antibody levels, as well as the age of participants. Women and younger men showed higher IL-2 production compared to participants above 55 years old. Men above 55 years old had decreased levels of anti-RBD IgG compared to those below 55 years old. Neutralizing antibody titers were lower in women above 55 compared to younger women. The third dose (BNT162b2) led to a significant increase in the production of specific and neutralizing antibodies. This increase was observed in both individuals above and below 55 years old compared to the second dose. In the immunodeficiency cohort, 26 CVID patients vaccinated with 2 doses of CoronaVac (N=14) or ChAdOx1 (N=9) and 2 CoronaVac + 1 BNT162b2 (N=14) were included. Healthy individuals vaccinated with CoronaVac (N=60) and boosted with BNT162b2 were included as controls (N=16). CVID patients vaccinated with 2 doses of ChAdOx1 showed higher levels of anti-RBD and S antibodies compared to those vaccinated with CoronaVac. Only individuals vaccinated with ChAdOx1 produced neutralizing antibodies against the Wuhan, Delta, and Gamma variants. Cellular response was low regardless of the vaccine platform. The 3-dose regimen (2 CoronaVac + 1 BNT162b2) induced a lower immune response than 2 doses of ChAdOx1. The vaccine response in CVID patients was lower than in healthy individuals. Our results indicate that the elderly benefited from the heterologous dose of BNT162b2; however, the duration of this response should be evaluated in longitudinal studies to ensure the optimal schedule for additional doses in this group. CVID patients had a better response to the two-dose regimen of ChAdOx1 compared to the 3-dose regimen, suggesting that those initially vaccinated with CoronaVac may not be adequately protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection and its complications
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2024-04-26
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.