• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Doctoral Thesis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/T.2.2018.tde-30102020-160019
Document
Author
Full name
Sarah Merçon-Vargas
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2018
Supervisor
Committee
Leonel, Ricardo de Barros (President)
Badaró, Gustavo Henrique Righi Ivahy
Castro, Daniel Penteado de
Corrêa, Fábio Peixinho Gomes
Shimura, Sérgio Seiji
Sica, Heitor Vitor Mendonça Fralino
Title in Portuguese
Garantias constitucionais nos processos punitivos não penais
Keywords in Portuguese
Corrupção
Devido processo legal
Direito Processual Civil
Garantias constitucionais
Improbidade administrativa
Sanção administrativa
Abstract in Portuguese
O trabalho tem por objetivo a análise das garantias constitucionais nos processos punitivos não penais. Nesta classe, incluem-se as ações de improbidade administrativa e as ações ajuizadas com base na Lei Anticorrupção. A partir do exame da natureza punitiva do direito material, com sanções severas que restringem direitos fundamentais, e da desigualdade estrutural da relação processual, demonstra-se que o standard de devido processo legal deve ser mais denso. Há mais garantias para o réu do que nos demais processos não penais e, em alguns casos, as garantias devem ser mais densas. Aplicam-se a esses processos as garantias do juiz natural, do contraditório, da ampla defesa e garantias correlatas, da presunção de inocência, do direito à prova, da motivação das decisões judiciais, do direito à razoável duração do processo, da publicidade do processo, do direito ao recurso e da proibição de submissão a novo julgamento. Tais garantias estão previstas na Constituição da República e na Convenção Americana de Direitos Humanos e tem desdobramentos específicos nos processos punitivos não penais.
Title in English
Constitutional rights on punitive non-criminal procedures
Keywords in English
Administrative Law sanctions
Anti-corruption law
Due process of law
Procedural principles
Punitive process
Abstract in English
This thesis focuses on the analysis of the constitutional rights on punitive non-criminal procedures. In this class of procedures there are actions of administrative improbity and lawsuits based on the Anticorruption Law. By examining the punitive nature of the substantive law, with severe sanctions which restrict fundamental rights, and the structural inequality of the procedural relation, it is patent that the standard of the due process of law should be more dense. It is necessary to also ensure more dense procedural rights, such as those offered in criminal procedures, such as a fair trial by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law, the principle of the adversarial system, and further rights, such as presumption of innocence unless proved guilty, right to produce evidence, the motivation of judicial decisions, right to be judged in reasonable time, the publicity of judicial acts, right to appeal, and the right not to be tried or punished twice for the same offence. These rights are provided by the Brazilian Constitution and by the American Convention on Human Rights.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
6540981_Tese_Parcial.pdf (609.43 Kbytes)
Publishing Date
2021-07-16
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.