• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Doctoral Thesis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/T.2.2020.tde-29032021-134630
Document
Author
Full name
Rafael Serra Oliveira
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2020
Supervisor
Committee
Badaró, Gustavo Henrique Righi Ivahy (President)
Gimenes, Marta Cristina Cury Saad
Knijnik, Danilo
Lopes Junior, Aury Celso Lima
Moura, Maria Thereza Rocha de Assis
Prado, Geraldo Luiz Mascarenhas
Title in Portuguese
Cadeia de custódia: admissibilidade e valoração da prova pericial de DNA
Keywords in Portuguese
DNA
Perícia (Processo penal)
Processo penal
Prova (Processo penal)
Abstract in Portuguese
O presente trabalho tem a finalidade de estabelecer os elos da cadeia de custódia da perícia de identificação por DNA e as consequências resultantes da sua inobservância. Para atingir esse objetivo, ao longo da pesquisa foram trabalhados os conceitos relacionados à prova pericial em geral, o seu tratamento legal e as especificidades do contraditório para esse meio de prova. Na sequência, foram desenvolvidas as questões essenciais relacionadas à cadeia de custódia, incluindo a sua conceituação, pressupostos, requisitos, elos, ônus de registro, limites e tratamento legal. A partir disso, passou-se a analisar as consequências que a quebra da cadeia de custódia tem na admissibilidade da prova, estabelecendo os critérios a serem verificados, em cada caso, para definir se a falta dos registros que autenticam a identidade e a integralidade do elemento ou fonte de prova impedem a sua entrada no processo ou se essas lacunas devem ser consideradas no momento de valoração da prova pelo juiz. Por fim, ao abordar as principais questões genéticas e técnicas relativas à perícia de identificação por DNA, aplicou-se a essa atividade probatória os conceitos e conclusões anteriormente estabelecidos sobre a cadeia de custódia e as consequências da sua quebra.
Title in English
Chain of custody: admissibility and assessesment of DNA identification expertise
Keywords in English
Admissibility
Chain of custody
Criminal proceedings
DNA identification
Expertise
Abstract in English
The purpose of this document is to establish links in the chain of custody for DNA identification expertise and the consequences arising from it being disregarded. To reach this objective, the research touched on concepts related to overall expert evidence, its legal approach and the specifics on the adversarial procedure for this method of proof. Next, fundamental issues related to the chain of custody were explored, including its conceptualization, assumptions, requirements, links, burden of records, limits and legal framework. From this point forward, an analysis was performed on the consequences that the breach of the chain of custody has on the admissibility of the evidence, determining the criteria to be verified in each case in order to define whether the lack of the records that authenticate the identity and the completeness of the element or source of evidence precludes it from being admitted into the case or whether these deficiencies should be considered at the time the judge assesses the evidence. Lastly, by addressing the key genetic and technical issues related to DNA identification expertise, the concepts and conclusions previously established concerning the chain of custody and the consequences of its breakdown were applied to this evidentiary activity.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
5746658_Tese_Parcial.pdf (432.78 Kbytes)
Publishing Date
2021-05-03
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.