• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Master's Dissertation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/D.2.2019.tde-10072020-164509
Document
Author
Full name
Davi Rodney Silva
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2019
Supervisor
Committee
Campos, Roberto Augusto de Carvalho (President)
Chaves, Anna Cecilia Santos
Destro, Paulo
Rassi, João Daniel
Title in Portuguese
Neurociência e culpabilidade
Keywords in Portuguese
Culpabilidade
Livre-arbítrio
Neurociências
Abstract in Portuguese
O presente trabalho tem por escopo analisar e conjugar dois temas discutidos pelas literaturas jurídico-penal e médica com certa dedicação nos últimos anos: o instituto da Culpabilidade e as Neurociências, respectivamente. Sabe-se que a Culpabilidade, pressuposto de aplicação de uma reprimenda penal, consiste em verdadeiro termômetro da democracia de direito das nações e, por esse motivo, todo e qualquer tema que lhe faça fronteira merece especial atenção, como é o caso das Neurociências. Desse modo, a dissertação, após fazer um traçado histórico sobre a Culpabilidade, chegando em seu conceito atual mais difundido, buscará demonstrar que o instituto é embasado no pressuposto do livre-arbítrio, sua coluna sustentadora, passando a confrontar esse aspecto sob a ótica dos experimentos neurocientíficos formulados por Benjamin Libet, na busca de responder à seguinte questão: é possível a compatibilização entre as proposições neurocientíficas iniciais de Benjamin Libet e a legitimação da aplicação da pena tendo a Culpabilidade como condição e o livrearbítrio como pressuposto?
Title in English
Neuroscience and culpability
Keywords in English
Culpability
Free will
Neurosciences
Abstract in English
The following paper analyzes and gathers information regarding two issues discussed by criminal law and medical literature, with extra attention over the past years: Culpability and Neuroscience, respectively. Culpability, which defines the application of criminal reprimands, is known as a true thermometer of nations' democracy; for that reason, every single field that might cover and enhance this subject deserves special attention, which is exactly the case when we are talking about Neuroscience. That being said, this dissertation has historically analyzed the fundamentals of Culpability, reaching its current widespread concept, demonstrating how Culpability is based on the assumption of the free will concept, the foundation of Culpability, confronting this aspect with the Neuroscience perspective. This paper will seek to respond to the following question: is it possible to align the initial neuroscienfic propositions of Benjamin Libet with the legitimization of criminal reprimand application having Culpability as a condition and free will as a preassumption?
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2020-07-28
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.