• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Doctoral Thesis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/T.9.2016.tde-25112016-142513
Document
Author
Full name
Ana Carolina Ramos Moreno
E-mail
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2008
Supervisor
Committee
Baquerizo, Marina (President)
Guth, Beatriz Ernestina Cabilio
Piazza, Roxane Maria Fontes
Ruiz, Rita de Cássia
Sant'Anna, Osvaldo Augusto Brazil Esteves
Title in Portuguese
Diferença de patogenicidade entre Escherichia coli enteroinvasora e Shigella flexneri em modelo experimental de infecção intestinal
Keywords in Portuguese
Célula dendrítica
Células Caco-2
EIEC
Escherichia colienteroinvasora
Fatores de virulência
Inflamação
Invasão
Resposta inflamatória
Shigella flexneri
Abstract in Portuguese
Neste trabalho, esclarecemos tópicos da patogenicidade de EIEC que sustentam a sua menor virulência quando comparada à S. flexneri, e mostramos a importância das células dendríticas (CD) nesse processo. Estudou-se o comportamento de EIEC e S. flexneri quando em contato com células Caco-2, avaliando-se uma cinética de expressão dos genes envolvidos na invasão e disseminação bacteriana. Em geral, todos os genes foram menos expressos em EIEC, fato corroborado pelo fenótipo de disseminação bacteriana, onde EIEC foi menos eficiente do que Shigella. Também foi avaliada a modulação da resposta inflamatória de células dendríticas intestinais murinas pela produção de citocinas, expressão de moléculas co-estimulatórias e apresentação de antígenos, após desafio das células com as bactérias. Os resultados sugerem que EIEC induz a uma resposta protetora ao hospedeiro, enquanto que Shigella estaria "driblando" o sistema imune, além de provavelmente super-estimular o sistema imune adaptativo, fato que poderia levar a um agravamento da doença. As ações integradas das células Caco-2, células dendríticas e estímulos bacterianos foram estudadas em co-cultura celular. Observou-se que EIEC e suas proteínas secretadas induzem a migração das CDs ao compartimento apical da co-cultura; nada foi observado quando o desafio se deu com Shigella. Também foram avaliadas as concentrações de citocinas inflamatórias no microambiente infeccioso formado. A citocina TNF-α, bem como CCL20 e MCP-1 foram mais proeminentes após estímulo com EIEC, fato que poderia explicar parcialmente a migração das CDs ao lado apical da co-cultura após estímulo com EIEC e suas proteínas secretadas. Nossas evidências experimentais indicam que a doença desencadeada por EIEC é mais restrita a um determinado local da infecção, ou seja, não é capaz de se disseminar a ponto de estender a lesão tecidual de forma mais drástica, como Shigella. Esse fenômeno pode estar associado à menor expressão de seus dos fatores de virulência e à resposta imune inata induzida no sítio de infecção, o que levaria, fatalmente, à resolução da doença.
Title in English
Pathogenicity difference between Escherichia colienteroinvasive and Shigella flexneri in an experimental model of intestinal infection
Keywords in English
Caco-2 cells
Dentritic cells
EIEC
Escherichia coli enteroinvasora
Factors of virulence
Inflammation
Inflammatory response
Invasion
Shigella flexneri
Abstract in English
In this study, we clarify topics of pathogenicity from EIEC that support its lower level of virulence when it is compared to S. flexneri, and we have shown the importance of dendritic cells (DC) in this process. We studied the conduct of EIEC and S. flexneri when they were in contact with Caco-2 cells and we analyzed the kinetics of the genes expression that was involved in the spread and invasion of the bacteria. In general, all genes were expressed less in EIEC, as demonstrated by the phenotype of the bacterial spread, where EIEC was less efficient than Shigella. We also analyzed the modulation of the inflammatory response by the murine intestinal dendritic cells by the production of cytokine, expression of co-stimulators molecules and antigens presentation, after the interaction of the cells with the bacteria. The results showed that EIEC induces a response that protects the host while Shigella manipulate the host intestinal innate and adaptive immune system and it probably over-stimulates the adaptive immune system which could let the disease worse. The integrated actions of Caco-2 cells, dendritic cells and bacterial stimulus, were studied in a co-culture cell. We observed that EIEC and its secreted proteins induce the migration of the DCs to the apical compartment of the co-culture; nothing was observed related to Shigella. We also evaluated the concentrations of the inflammatory cytokines at the infective micro environment that was formed. The cytokine TNF-α, as CCL20 and MCP-1 were more prominent after been stimulated with EIEC, a fact that could partially explain the migration of DCs to the apical side of the co-culture after the stimulus with EIEC and its secreted proteins. Our experimental evidence shows that the disease triggered by the EIEC is more restricted at a definite infection place, which means that it is not capable of disseminating beyond a certain point to extend the tissue's injury and let it worsen, as Shigella do. This phenomenon can be associated with the lower level of expression of its virulence factors and to the immune response induced in the infection site, what could finally lead to the eradication of the disease.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2016-11-25
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.