• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Master's Dissertation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/D.5.2006.tde-12042006-104803
Document
Author
Full name
Eduardo Arnaldi Simões de Oliveira
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2005
Supervisor
Committee
Lucon, Antonio Marmo (President)
Denes, Francisco Tibor
Wroclawski, Eric Roger
Title in Portuguese
"Vasectomia: comparação das técnicas convencional e sem bisturi"
Keywords in Portuguese
Anticoncepção
Contagem de espermatozóides
Procedimentos cirúrgicos ambulatórios
Vasectomia/métodos
Abstract in Portuguese
Esse estudo foi realizado de maneira prospectiva e randomizada com o objetivo de comparar duas técnicas de vasectomia. Foram avaliados 644 pacientes. Na técnica sem bisturi foram utilizadas duas pinças específicas. O tempo médio da técnica sem bisturi foi de 20,95 minutos e da convencional 22,95. Infecção de ferida operatória e epididimites foram menores na técnica sem bisturi. Não houve diferença entre as técnicas nas complicações intra-operatórias e pós-operatórias. Dez pacientes apresentaram espermatozóides vivos no espermograma de controle. A técnica sem bisturi apresenta um menor tempo cirúrgico e um menor índice de infecção que a técnica convencional. O índice de falha foi semelhante em ambas as técnicas
Title in English
Vasectomy: comparison between conventional and noscalpel techniques
Keywords in English
Ambulatory surgical procedures
Contraception
Sperm count
Vasectomy/methods
Abstract in English
This study was carried out with objective of comparison two techiniques of vasectomy. Six hundred and fourteen four patients were assessed. For the no-scalpel technique, two specific clamps were used. The operating time for the no scalpel technique was less than for the conventional technique. There was a smaller percentage of infection of the operative wound and epididymitis in the no scalpel technique. There was no difference between the techniques with respect to complications during the operation and later complications. The no scalpel technique requires less time in surgery and has a lower infection rate than the conventional technique. The failure rate was similar for both techniques
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2006-04-12
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.