• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Master's Dissertation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/D.5.2016.tde-04042016-110353
Document
Author
Full name
Marcos de Camargo Leonhardt
E-mail
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2012
Supervisor
Committee
Croci, Alberto Tesconi (President)
Queiroz, Roberto Dantas
Baptista, André Mathias
Title in Portuguese
Estudo comparativo da osteointegração da haste femoral não cimentada nas artroplastias totais do quadril em pacientes com má qualidade óssea e com boa qualidade óssea
Keywords in Portuguese
Artroplastia de quadril
Densidade óssea
Osteointegração
Quadril
Abstract in Portuguese
Introdução: Com o desenvolvimento das artroplastias não cimentadas, estudos vêm sendo realizados com o objetivo de se determinar se as hastes femorais não cimentadas poderiam ser utilizadas em qualquer paciente,ou estaria reservada apenas para aqueles que possuem boa qualidade óssea. Um estudo comparativo é realizado para avaliar a osteointegração de hastes femorais não cimentadas nas artroplastias totais de quadril em pacientes que apresentam má qualidade óssea, comparando com pacientes que apresentam boa qualidade óssea. Materiais e métodos: Este estudo inclui 196 pacientes submetidos à artroplastia total do quadril primária não cimentada por diagnóstico de osteoartrite primária e secundária com no mínimo de 12 meses de seguimento, divididos em dois grupos: um contendo pacientes com boa qualidade óssea (DorrA); e outro com pacientes com má qualidade óssea (Dorr B e C). Foi avaliada a osteointegração através da análise radiográfica seguindo os critérios estabelecidos por Engh, além de avaliar o resultado clínico e funcional através do questionário de WOMAC. Foram também avaliadas as complicações decorrentes do processo cirúrgico em ambos os grupos. Resultados:Há diferença na frequência do gênero no grupo Má Qualidade Óssea (MQO) (p=0,009) com predomínio de mulheres e diferença no diagnóstico inicial,havendo um número maior de casos de patologias reumatológicas e sequelas de displasia no grupo MQO (p=0,0002). Não observamos diferença quanto a idade, lado operado e tempo de seguimento entre os dois grupos. Não observamos diferença entre os grupos quando avaliado o escore clínico, a osteointegração ou a necessidade de revisão. Observamos um maior risco de fratura intraoperatória do fêmur proximal no grupo MQO (p=0.03) comparando-se com o grupo Boa Qualidade Óssea (BQO). Conclusão: Concluímos que as hastes femorais não cimentadas osteointegram igualmente, independentemente da qualidade óssea do paciente e que fraturas intraoperatórias ocorrem mais quando realizadas hastes femorais não cimentadas em pacientes com má da qualidade óssea
Title in English
Comparative study of osseointegration of uncemented femoral stem in total hip replacements in patients with poor bone quality and good bone quality
Keywords in English
Bone density
Hip
Hip arthroplasty
Osseointegration
Abstract in English
Introduction: With the development of the non cemented total hip replacement, many studies were carried out to determinate if uncemented femoral stem can be used in every patient, or if this kind of implants are reserved for those patients with good bone quality. A comparative study was carried out to evaluate the osseointegration of uncemented femoral stem in total hip replacements in patients that have poor bone quality, comparing with patients that have good bone quality. Methods: The study included 196 cases of primary uncemented total hip arthroplasties due to a diagnosis of primary or secondary osteoarthritis, with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, divided in two groups: one with patients that have good bone quality (Type A Dorr), and another with patients that have poor bone quality (Types B and C Dorr). Osseointegration was evaluated by X ray analysis, following the Engh's criteria. Clinical and functional results were also evaluated by the application of the WOMAC questionnaire, and complication in both groups were reported. Results: Regarding our patient' gender, we observed a significant difference between the two groups: there was more women in the group of Poor Bone Quality (PBQ) (p=0,009). We also observed a significant difference in the initial diagnosis of the patients: there was more osteoarthritis secondary to rheumatic pathologies and hip dysplasia in the PBQ group (p=0,0002). There was no difference when observed the mean age, operation' side and mean time of follow-up between the two groups. We also did not observed differences between the groups when evaluated the clinical scores, the osseointegration of the femoral stem and the need of revision of the arthroplasty by any reason. But, in the PBQ, we observed a higher risk of intra operative fracture in the proximal femur compared with the group Good Bone Quality (GBQ) (p=0,03). Conclusion: We concluded that the uncemented femoral stem has an equal rate of osseointegration, despite the bone quality and that there is a higher risk of intra operative fracture when implanted an uncemented femoral stem in bone with poor quality
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2016-04-04
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.