• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Doctoral Thesis
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/T.48.2013.tde-04062013-133620
Document
Author
Full name
Dildo Pereira Brasil
E-mail
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Paulo, 2013
Supervisor
Committee
Severino, Antonio Joaquim (President)
Amaral, Maria Nazare de Camargo Pacheco
Mariani, Ceci Maria Costa Baptista
Nunes, Antonio Vidal
Wirth, Lauri Emílio
Title in Portuguese
Antropologia e educação: raízes contraculturais do pensamento pedagógico de Rubem Alves
Keywords in Portuguese
Contracultura
Corpo
Educação pós-moderna
Filosofia brasileira
Rubem Alves
Sujeito desejante
Abstract in Portuguese
A tese resulta de pesquisa sobre o pensamento educacional de Rubem Alves, em diálogo com Nietzsche, Marx, Freud, Kierkegaard, Wittgenstein, Feuerbach, Fernando Pessoa, Adélia Prado, Guimarães Rosa e muitos outros, filósofos, poetas e literatos, explicitando as bases humanísticas e contraculturais de seu pensamento filosófico e pedagógico. De caráter bibliográfico, a pesquisa restringe-se intencionalmente, à obra de Rubem Alves e às diversas dissertações e teses sobre o pensamento. Busca mostrar que preocupação primeira de Rubem Alves é o resgate da concepção do homem, enquanto ser corporal, de desejos e de sonhos, no interior das filosofias, culturas e literatura ocidentais. Mostra então que a proposta pedagógica de Rubem Alves tem raízes antropológicas e contraculturais, ancoradas no pensamento crítico e romântico, em contraponto à metafísica clássica e ao pensamento moderno, iluminista, cientificista e positivista. Com Freud, Feuerbach, Kierkegaard, diversos poetas e literatos, mostra que a essência da vida e do homem está mais no desejo e na imaginação que na razão. Para se compreender este postulado norteador do pensamento do filósofo brasileiro, dois conceitos foram trabalhados: o corpo e a linguagem. Evidencia-se que, sem formular proposta pedagógica sistemática e metodologicamente conformada aos parâmetros acadêmicos, este pensador formula profundas e contundentes críticas às pedagogias tradicionais que, considera intelectualistas, centradas em saberes abstratos, desencarnados e distantes da vida e das experiências concretas dos alunos. Os resultados da presente investigação encontram-se arrolados nas Considerações Finais e podem ser sintetizados na seguinte proposição: confirma-se a existência, no pensamento alvesiano, de uma proposta pedagógica, disseminada em suas mais de oitocentas crônicas e nos mais de trinta livros de estórias para pequenos e grandes. É, também, parte integrante das conclusões desta pesquisa a afirmação de que a referida proposta tem raízes antropológicas e reminiscências românticas e contraculturais, que, por sua vez se fundam em seu pensamento filosófico e teológico.
Title in English
Anthropology and education: Rubem Alves´s countercultural roots of pedagogical thought
Keywords in English
After modern education
Body
Brazilian philosophy
Countercultural
Desiring subject
Rubem Alves
Abstract in English
The thesis is a result of a research about Rubem Alvess educational thoughts in a dialogue with Nietzsche, Marx, Freud, Koerkegaard, Wittgensteins, Feuerbach, Fernando Pessoa, Adélia Prado, Guimarães Rosa and many other philosophers, poets and literatis explaining the countercultural and humanistic bases of his philosophical and pedagogical thoughts. On a bibliographic matter this research is willfully restricted to Rubem Alvess work and several other dissertations and thesis about his thought and it searches show that Rubem Alvess first concern is the conception of mans rescue inside the philosophy, the culture and the western literature as a carnal being of wishes and dreams. As it is, also shows that Rubem Alvess pedagogical proposal has anthropological and countercultural roots on the critical and romantic thought opposing to the classic metaphysics and to the modern, to the illuminist, to the scientific and to the positivist thoughts. As written by Freud, Feuerback, Kierkegaard and divers poets and literatis, Rubem Alves explicitates that the essence of life and man is inside the desire and imagination more than it is in rationality. To understand the guiding principle of the Brazilian philosopher thought, two concepts were worked/used, the body and the language. Without formulate a systematic and methodological pedagogic proposal conformed to the academics parameters, is evident that this speculator presents deep and stinging critics about the traditional pedagogies that he considerate intellectualist, focused on abstract knowledge disembodied and far from life and from concrete students experience. The results of this present investigation are found enrolled on Final Considerations and can be synthesized in the following proposition: in the ALVESIANO thinking it is confirmed the existence of a pedagogical proposal, disseminated in its more than eight hundred chronic and in more than thirty books of stories for little ones and grown ones. It is also inside the conclusions of this research and confirm that the said proposal has anthropologic roots and romantic and countercultural reminiscence that are merged in a philosophical and theological thought.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
ANEXOS.pdf (309.96 Kbytes)
BIBLIOGRAFIAGERAL.pdf (420.50 Kbytes)
CAPITULODOIS.pdf (414.04 Kbytes)
CAPITULOQUATRO.pdf (512.62 Kbytes)
CAPITULOTRES.pdf (511.81 Kbytes)
CAPITULOUM.pdf (642.11 Kbytes)
CONSIDERACOESFINAIS.pdf (357.97 Kbytes)
INTRODUCAO.pdf (354.15 Kbytes)
Publishing Date
2013-06-12
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.