• JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
  • JoomlaWorks Simple Image Rotator
 
  Bookmark and Share
 
 
Master's Dissertation
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11606/D.18.2016.tde-19022016-145650
Document
Author
Full name
Jean Carlo García Núñez
Institute/School/College
Knowledge Area
Date of Defense
Published
São Carlos, 2005
Supervisor
Committee
Celestino, Tarcísio Barreto (President)
Bortolucci, Antonio Airton
Manzoli, Osvaldo Luiz
Title in Portuguese
Avaliação da resistência e modos de ruptura em modelos de maçicos rochosos fraturados com base em análise numérica
Keywords in Portuguese
Análises numéricas
Método de elementos distintos
Modelos físicos
Modelos fraturados
Taludes
Abstract in Portuguese
Neste trabalho são abordados dois aspectos relacionados com modelos físicos fraturados: o primeiro, referido à resistência, é abordado através da avaliação de ensaios triaxiais em modelos fraturados pelo critério empírico de resistência de Hoek-Brown, e por análise numérica através do Código Universal de Elementos Distintos (UDEC). O segundo, referido a modos de ruptura, é abordado através da simulação em termos de deformabilidade e resistência de modelos fraturados e a simulação de taludes de diferentes alturas com o intuito de estudar a influência do tamanho do bloco no modo de ruptura. Ambos aspectos estão baseados nos resultados experimentais de Brown (1970) e de Singh (1997). A influêcia do tamanho do bloco no modo de ruptura foi estudada utilizando RMR89", levando em consideração a escala do maciço (altura do talude). Através de análises numéricas preliminares e de um processo de retroanálises, foi simulado o comportamento mecânico dos modelos fraturados referidos. A avaliação da resistência aplicando o critério de resistência empírica de Hoek-Brown mostrou resultados coerentes quando comparados com os resultados experimentais de Brown (1970). Através de RMR89" foi possível observar a influência do tamanho do bloco nos modos de ruptura e na estabilidade dos taludes de diferentes alturas.
Title in English
Evaluation of strength and failure modes of jointed rock mass models based on numerical analyses
Keywords in English
Distinct element method
Jointed models
Numerical analyses
Physical models
Slopes
Abstract in English
This works treats about two aspects related to jointed physical models: one related to strength, by back-analyzing data using the Hoek-Brown criterion by means of numerical analyses with the Universal Distinct Element Code (UDEC). The record refers to failure modes, is analyzed by means of numerical simulations taking into account deformability and strength of jointed physical models, as well as the simulation of slopes in jointed rock masses. Slopes of different heigths and different block sizes were analyzed to investigate scale effects. The analyses were made taking experimental results obtained by Brown (1970) and Singh (1997). The influence of the block size was studied using RMR89", taking the rock mass scale into consideration. Strength evaluation adopting Hoek-Brown empirical strength criterion proved consistent with Brown's model test results. By means of RMR89" the influence of the block size could be analyzed on failure models and in the stability of slopes with different heights.
 
WARNING - Viewing this document is conditioned on your acceptance of the following terms of use:
This document is only for private use for research and teaching activities. Reproduction for commercial use is forbidden. This rights cover the whole data about this document as well as its contents. Any uses or copies of this document in whole or in part must include the author's name.
Publishing Date
2016-02-19
 
WARNING: Learn what derived works are clicking here.
All rights of the thesis/dissertation are from the authors
CeTI-SC/STI
Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations of USP. Copyright © 2001-2024. All rights reserved.